← Back to Sticking

Typing Blog

Tips, techniques, and guides to improve your typing skills

LLM‑Powered IMEs in 2025: Gboard vs. iOS 18 Writing Tools for Faster, Safer Multilingual Typing

LLM‑Powered IMEs in 2025: Gboard vs. iOS 18 Writing Tools for Faster, Safer Multilingual Typing

We put modern, AI‑assisted keyboards under a microscope: Gboard’s expanding proofreading, new flick‑to‑symbol shortcut, and a compact Hindi grid layout go head‑to‑head with iOS 18’s on‑device Writing Tools. We outline a simple test protocol to measure speed, accuracy, and edit‑rate, explain privacy/latency trade‑offs of on‑device vs. cloud AI, and share setup tips for multilingual users.

Read more →
Spaced Typing: An Adaptive, Interleaved Scheduler That Fixes Your Weak Bigrams (For Good)

Spaced Typing: An Adaptive, Interleaved Scheduler That Fixes Your Weak Bigrams (For Good)

Spaced Typing brings evidence-based learning to typing tests by auto-detecting your most error‑prone n‑grams and scheduling short, interleaved drills that stick. Backed by recent findings on interleaving in skill encoding and emerging LLM‑enhanced spaced learning, this approach aims to cut errors, boost retention, and transfer improvements to real-world text.

Read more →
Beyond WPM: New Typing Metrics Your Test Should Track in 2026 (KSPC, Error Cost, and Rollover)

Beyond WPM: New Typing Metrics Your Test Should Track in 2026 (KSPC, Error Cost, and Rollover)

WPM and accuracy only tell part of the story. In 2026, the best typing tests will also track keystrokes per character (KSPC), error-cost per error, and rollover/burst dynamics to expose wasted motion and show how fast typists differ. Here’s why these metrics matter and a practical blueprint to instrument them in a web-based typing test.

Read more →
Voice vs Keyboard, 2025 Edition: Can On‑Device AI Dictation Beat Touch Typing for Real Work?

Voice vs Keyboard, 2025 Edition: Can On‑Device AI Dictation Beat Touch Typing for Real Work?

Voice input has leapt forward in 2025 thanks to on‑device AI. We compare modern voice tools—Gboard’s Gemini Nano Writing Tools, Windows 11’s new on‑device fluid dictation in Voice Access, and Apple’s inline predictive text and on‑device Dictation—against touch typing, using metrics like net WPM, edit rate, latency, and privacy. The bottom line: voice is blisteringly fast for first drafts in the right conditions, but keyboards still dominate precision edits and noisy environments.

Read more →
Beyond CAPTCHAs: Using Keystroke Biometrics to Keep Typing Test Leaderboards Fair in 2026

Beyond CAPTCHAs: Using Keystroke Biometrics to Keep Typing Test Leaderboards Fair in 2026

CAPTCHAs alone can’t keep modern typing leaderboards clean. This article outlines a privacy‑first anti‑cheat blueprint that passively flags bot‑like timing patterns with state‑of‑the‑art keystroke‑verification models, then escalates to lightweight human checks—tailored for both desktop and mobile—and explains how to tune thresholds, guard privacy, and communicate fairness to users.

Read more →
The Copilot Key Era: How One‑Tap AI Is Reshaping Typing Workflows

The Copilot Key Era: How One‑Tap AI Is Reshaping Typing Workflows

Microsoft’s new Copilot key is the first major change to the Windows keyboard since 1994—and it’s already changing how we type, prompt, and stay in flow. This article shows how one‑tap AI affects real‑world workflows for writers, developers, and remote workers, introduces a ‘prompt WPM’ metric, and explains mid‑2025 changes to how the key behaves on managed Windows 11 PCs.

Read more →
The Polling‑Rate Paradox: Do 8,000 Hz Keyboards Actually Help You Type Faster?

The Polling‑Rate Paradox: Do 8,000 Hz Keyboards Actually Help You Type Faster?

Ultra‑high polling started as a gaming flex—but does it move the needle for writers and programmers? We explain polling vs. scan rate, outline a repeatable way to measure real typing latency, and compare 1,000 Hz with 8,000 Hz (plus today’s fastest wireless) to see what actually matters at your desk.

Read more →
Do Rapid‑Trigger Hall‑Effect Keyboards Actually Make You Type Faster? A Typist‑Focused, Data‑Driven Look

Do Rapid‑Trigger Hall‑Effect Keyboards Actually Make You Type Faster? A Typist‑Focused, Data‑Driven Look

Hall‑effect keyboards with rapid trigger and 8 kHz polling exploded in 2025, promising ultra‑low latency and adjustable actuation. We lay out (and invite you to replicate) a within‑subjects typing study that tunes actuation to 0.1–0.3 mm per user and measures WPM, KSPC, and errors over 30–60 minutes—then translate lab design into practical tuning tips for writers and coders.

Read more →